A supplier file fails the hour someone treats a brochure as a test. Split the pages before the meeting, and leave a row blank when the file is missing.

Example of plain folders and a closed notebook on a stainless-steel table.

This checklist is the deliverable. It is a list of questions. It does not say that any machine passed a named scheme. No model, speed, or power is printed, because no manufacturer sheet was opened for this draft. A local library search was not used to fill those cells.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration study section dated 9 August 2004 asked a panel which problems apply at a processor. “Poor plant and equipment sanitation” and “contamination of raw materials” were on that list. This page uses those names as reasons to ask for a file. It does not treat the 2004 list as the rule that applies to a plant today. The current regulation was not opened.

Expected deliverables

Title promiseWhat is on this pageHow to check
A checklistThe questions belowEach line asks for a document or says to leave the line blank
PileAskLeave blank if
RecordWhich page names the object, the date, and the person who signed?The page has no date
TestWhich page names the method, the sample, and the result?The result is only a slogan
ClaimWhich sentence has no file behind it?You have not marked it as a claim
SanitationWhere is the cleaning instruction, and which parts does it stop short of?The instruction is not in the file
MaterialsWhich record covers the raw material or the contact material?The lot is not identified

Three piles drawn as a list: record, test, claim, and the gap.

  • Put the brochure in the claim pile even when the wording sounds technical.
  • Do not copy a peer plant's numbers into this file and call them yours.
  • Do not write a pass or a fail in the margin of this sheet.
  • Take the sanitation questions to the cleanability page.
  • Take the pack questions to the seal page.

A second list of what the sheet refuses to decide.

The same study’s further-reading list names an old audit document on this domain. That citation is explained, with the year, on the history page. It is not a reason to treat this checklist as an audit.